Pros and Cons: Managed Services VS In-House Talent VS Hybrid

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Author
Tanya Renne
Date
January 29, 2024
Topic
Domains
Associations
Resources
Data
Service Offerings
Implementation
Managed Services
Pros and Cons: Managed Services VS In-House Talent VS Hybrid
Here are the pros and cons of Salesforce Managed Services, In-House Talent and a Hybrid approach to maintaining technical operations.

You did the work to find a system, lived through the implementation and now you’ve got to figure out how to maintain it. As someone once told me – it’s all well and good to find the money to buy a Giraffe – but now you have to feed it. Let’s consider the pros and cons of Managed Services, In-House Talent and a Hybrid approach to maintaining technical operations.

Managed Services

  1. Cost Savings
    • Pro: Managed services often offer cost savings as they operate on a subscription or pay-as-you-go model, reducing upfront capital expenses.
    • Con: The cost can accumulate over time, and unexpected charges may arise.
  2. Access to Specialized Skills:
    • Pro: Provides access to a diverse range of specialized skills and expertise.
    • Con: Dependency on external expertise, which may not fully understand the intricacies of your business.
  3. Scalability:
    • Pro: Easily scalable, allowing you to adjust resources based on business needs.
managed services
    • Con: Potential challenges in aligning with the specific nuances of your organization's processes and requirements.
  1. Focus on Core Business:
    • Pro: Allows your internal team to focus on core business functions while outsourcing non-core activities.
    • Con: Dependency on external entities for critical business functions.
  2. 24/7 Support:
    • Pro: Many managed service providers offer continuous support and monitoring.
    • Con: Lack of immediate on-site support, which may be crucial for some organizations.

In-House Talent

  1. Cultural Alignment:
    • Pro: In-house teams typically have a better understanding of the company culture, goals, and internal processes.
    • Con: May lead to insular thinking and limited exposure to external best practices.
  2. Immediate Access:
    • Pro: Enables face-to-face collaboration, quick response to urgent needs, and better communication.
    • Con: Higher operational costs, including salaries, benefits, and infrastructure.
  3. Control and Customization:
    • Pro: Direct control over hiring, training, and management, allowing for customization.
    • Con: Limited access to specialized skills and potential challenges in recruiting and retaining top talent.
  4. Security:
    • Pro: Enhanced control over data security and compliance.
    • Con: The need for significant investment in cybersecurity measures and expertise.
  5. Integrated Team Dynamics:
    • Pro: In-house teams can develop strong team dynamics and a shared sense of mission.
    • Con: Limited exposure to external perspectives and potential for groupthink.

Hybrid Approach

  1. Flexibility:
    • Pro: Provides the flexibility to leverage both in-house and external expertise based on specific needs.
    • Con: Requires effective management to ensure seamless collaboration between internal and external teams.
  2. Cost Optimization:
    • Pro: Optimizes costs by strategically outsourcing non-core functions while maintaining control over critical processes.
    • Con: Complexity in managing a dual structure, and potential for communication gaps.
  3. Scalability and Specialization:
    • Pro: Combines the scalability of managed services with the internal expertise of in-house teams.
    • Con: Requires careful coordination to align external and internal efforts effectively.
  4. Risk Mitigation:
    • Pro: Reduces the risk of being entirely dependent on one model, offering a backup if one side faces challenges.
    • Con: Requires a sophisticated governance structure to manage the hybrid model effectively.
  5. Access to Innovation:
    • Pro: Can bring in external innovation and best practices while maintaining the stability of internal processes.
    • Con: Potential resistance to change within the organization.

Choosing between these models depends on the unique requirements, budget, and strategic goals of your organization. Many businesses find that a hybrid approach allows them to balance flexibility, control, and cost-effectiveness effectively. Regular assessments and adjustments are often necessary to optimize the chosen model over time.

Orchid Connect is a woman-owned Salesforce implementation firm with 30 years of experience serving associations, non-profits and small/medium businesses. We specialize in strategic and implementation services, go-to-market support, and ongoing support. To learn more, reach us at reachout@orchidconnect.com.

More blogs

Discover the latest trends, best practices, and expert opinions that can reshape your perspective